Skip to main content

Misinformation about Biometric Technology Continues to Fuel Functionality Misconceptions

Today, we came across the following blog post from Guy Huntington at Infosec Island:
“What Happened to My Biometric?”
In the post, the author discusses the inherent dangers of opting into a biometric identification system by providing your fingerprint and the possible negative privacy and identity theft consequences if a user does not make sure that their biometric template is deleted from the system if they leave or opt-out.
Our take: While we are always pleased to see biometric technology pop up in the news or through blog postings, we often cringe when we see these types of articles that essentially do not accurately depict biometric technology, and leave readers with ill-conceived perceptions about how the technology actually works.
Anyone who works in the biometric industry can attest to the fact that there is never an image of a user’s fingerprint stored. The truth of the matter is that biometric enrollment templates stored on a server are not actually an image of the fingerprint at all. They are a mathematical representation of the data points that a biometric algorithm extracts from the scanned fingerprint. The algorithm then uses the template to positively identify a user during subsequent fingerprint scans. No image of the fingerprint is ever stored or transmitted across a network. In addition, the algorithm is “one way” which means that the template that is extracted is nearly impossible to be used to recreate the original fingerprint image. In other words, it is nearly impossible to reverse engineer the data that is sent to positively identify a user and successfully “steal” their biometric identity.
After understanding the truth behind the technology, this leaves us with the question, “Where is the fear of identity theft?  Privacy issues?”  Furthermore, we can’t seem to make a connection with the logic in this blog post about what exactly a criminal would do with a fingerprint image (if they could ever possibly re-create it which is nearly impossible) if they were to obtain it?  9.9 times out of 10 biometric systems do not associate names with a biometric template so how would the criminal/hacker know whose biometric information it actually is?
We continue working tirelessly to vociferate with the technology media and pundits to please make sure that you understand the science behind biometric technology before writing these types of articles.  The only objective that a posting like this achieves is fueling misconceptions and falsehoods about biometrics and how the technology works.  In addition, we stand behind our software as being secure and protecting an individual’s privacy and the potential for identity theft.  We hope that our words and actions will have an impact on spreading the truth about biometric technology and its benefits.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iris Recognition vs. Retina Scanning – What are the Differences?

In biometrics, iris and retinal scanning are known as “ocular-based” identification technologies, meaning they rely on unique physiological characteristics of the eye to identify an individual. Even though they both share part of the eye for identification purposes, these biometric modalities are quite different in how they work. Let’s take a closer look at both and then explain the similarities and differences in detail: Retinal Scanning:  The human retina is a thin tissue composed of neural cells that are located in the posterior portion of the eye. Because of the complex structure of the capillaries that supply the retina with blood, each person’s retina is unique. The network of blood vessels in the retina is so complex that even identical twins do not share a similar pattern. Although retinal patterns may be altered in cases of diabetes, glaucoma or retinal degenerative disorders, the retina typically remains unchanged from birth until death. (Source: Wikipedia) ...
1 comment
Read more

False Rejection Rate – What Does It Mean And Why Should I Care?

False reject rate   is a statistic used to measure biometric performance when operating in the verification task and it usually calculated as the percentage of times the system produces a false reject.  A false reject occurs when an individual is not matched to their own existing biometric template.  For example: John claims to be John, but the system incorrectly denies the verification.  This can be particularly frustrating for an end user who knows that they are enrolled in the system and should be recognized and verified, but for some reason the system is incorrectly rejecting their scan.  This can cause unnecessary logjams, affect service, frustrate staff and negatively impact productivity.
Post a Comment
Read more

Best Biometric Software for Windows 7

Finding the best biometric software for windows 7 should not be a controversial issue. It is yet rather simple to compare between all the biometric software in the market today. A proper biometric software has to have 3 criteria to be called the best biometric software for windows 7. These are, the ability to perfectly integrate with any sort of developing environment, the ability to perform better, faster and accurate, and lastly, multimodality of the single biometric software, which means one single biometric software supports multiple biometric authentications. Let’s now take a look at the M2SYS   CloudABIS™  multimodal biometric solution and then you can decide yourself if it is the best biometric software for windows seven or not. The most amazing thing about  CloudABIS™  is that it totally removes your burden of creating an SDK. Just imagine how much that saves you in terms of money, time and hassle. CloudABIS™  is a multimodal biometric matching sy...
Post a Comment
Read more