When You Think About Biometrics, You Think Fingerprint
For those who are familiar with biometric
technology, the first picture that probably pops into your head is a
fingerprint scanner. This makes sense as fingerprint technology is the
most widely recognizable and the most frequently deployed biometric modality in
the industry. Fingerprint biometric technology is a solid technology but not a one-size-fits-all
biometric solution and its effectiveness is
impacted by fingerprint integrity which can be compromised under certain
conditions (e.g. – dirt, grime, grease, cuts, scrapes scars) environments (e.g.
– temperature) and age groups (especially older demographics). In fact, we recently wrote about
questions to ask before you choose the appropriate biometric system
which you can review again.
In addition,
within the biometric industry it is often discussed that there is a small
percentage of the population which simply have unreadable fingerprints,
rendering fingerprint biometric technology ineffectual. There are also
certain vertical markets that have higher exposure to adverse conditions that
render fingerprint biometrics more difficult to use effectively.
Considering the limitations of fingerprint biometric technology,
especially in the environments we described above, businesses within these
vertical markets that recognize the value of biometric technology may want to
consider deploying vascular biometrics instead.
Vascular Biometrics Works Well In Membership Management
Membership management is a perfect example of a
vertical market that can directly benefit from vascular biometric
technology. If you recall, vascular biometrics does not rely on
fingerprints for identification purposes. Rather, it relies on capturing
an image of the vein pattern beneath the finger or skin and using that image as
the basis for individual identification. Unlike fingerprint technology,
the integrity of the skin is not an issue with vascular biometrics. By
using near infrared light to capture a finger vein or palm vein pattern beneath
the skin surface to identify an individual, vascular biometrics bypasses the
need to have quality fingerprints in order to successfully use a biometric
identification system for 100% of your population and allows end users to use
biometrics in environments that otherwise are not conducive to fingerprint
technology.
Here are
some advantages of using vascular biometric technology vs. fingerprint:
1.
Due
to the wide age demographic that membership management serves, vascular
biometrics is a reliable technology that can identify near 100% of clientele
which keeps the check-in process flowing.
2.
Fingerprint
integrity is no longer an issue so vascular biometrics eliminates sensitivity
to members who may work in professions where their fingerprints could be
compromised.
3.
Members
tend to be more apprehensive about offering their fingerprints as a means of
identification due to the perception that it can be stolen or compromised and
used to steal their identity. Since most membership organizations that
choose to use biometric technology for identification offer it as a voluntary
service, members tend to be more likely to opt-in to finger vein technology
which is perceived as being more acceptable.
4.
Member
ID cards are no longer needed saving the expense of producing and replacing the
cards which can be quite costly.
Recently, Montgomery County
Maryland Recreation Centers began using M2SYS’ hybrid biometric platform
technology with finger vein readers for their member check-in.
Comments
Post a Comment